June 2011
NOTE: This version replaces the one dated June 2007
The information in this bulletin does not replace the law found in the Excise Tax Act (the Act) and its regulations. It is provided for your reference. As it may not completely address your particular operation, you may wish to refer to the Act or appropriate regulation, or contact a Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) GST/HST rulings office for more information. A ruling should be requested for certainty in respect of any particular GST/HST matter. Pamphlet RC4405, GST/HST Rulings - Experts in GST/HST Legislation explains how to obtain a ruling and lists the GST/HST rulings offices. If you wish to make a technical enquiry on the GST/HST by telephone, please call 1‑800‑959‑8287.
Reference in this publication is made to supplies that are subject to the GST or the HST. The HST applies in the participating provinces at the following rates: 13% in Ontario, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador, 15% in Nova Scotia, and 12% in British Columbia. The GST applies in the rest of Canada at the rate of 5%. If you are uncertain as to whether a supply is made in a participating province, you may refer to GST/HST Technical Information Bulletin B‑103, Harmonized Sales Tax - Place of Supply Rules for Determining Whether a Supply is Made in a Province.
If you are located in Quebec and wish to make a technical enquiry or request a ruling related to the GST/HST, please contact Revenu Québec at 1‑800‑567‑4692. You may also visit the Revenu Québec Web site to obtain general information.
All references are to the Excise Tax Act unless stated otherwise.
This bulletin explains the new import rules for financial institutions (FIs) in sections 217, 217.1, 217.2, 218.01, 218.1, 218.3 and 219 of Division IV of Part IX of the Act which generally apply for specified years that end after November 16, 2005.
The import rules apply to a qualifying taxpayer in addition to the rules for imported taxable supplies and the corresponding self‑assessment requirement under section 218 and subsection 218.1(1) under Division IV.
The purpose of all the examples in this TIB is to demonstrate the GST/HST concepts, for example whether an amount is qualifying consideration, and not to demonstrate whether an amount would be deducted under the Income Tax Act (the ITA). As such, an assumption and not a determination has been made for purposes of the examples that an amount is or would be deductible under the ITA.
The import rules for FIs apply to:
These FIs are referred to as "qualifying taxpayers" for purposes of the import rules.
A qualifying taxpayer is required to self‑assess on each amount of "qualifying consideration" in respect of an "outlay made, or an expense incurred, outside Canada" that is greater than zero for a specified year. However, as an alternative to self‑assessing on qualifying consideration, where an election is in effect, a qualifying taxpayer resident in Canada is required to self‑assess on the total of each amount that is an "internal charge" that is greater than zero for a specified year, and each amount that is an "external charge" that is greater than zero for a specified year.
Generally, where the requirements for claiming an input tax credit (ITC) are met, a qualifying taxpayer may be entitled to claim ITCs in respect of the tax self‑assessed under certain conditions.
The term financial institution is defined in subsection 149(1). The definition includes FIs that are listed in paragraph 149(1)(a) such as a bank, trust corporation or an insurer, as well as de minimis FIs described in paragraphs 149(1)(b) and (c). See the Appendix for further information on the meaning of financial institution.
Pursuant to subsection 217.1(1), a person is a qualifying taxpayer throughout a specified year of the person if
As a result of the proposed Draft Regulations Amending Various GST/HST Regulations (Part 5) Financial Services (GST/HST) Regulations issued January 28, 2011, for any specified year that begins on or after July 1, 2010, a non‑resident trust is a prescribed person for the purposes of the qualifying taxpayer rules if the total value of the assets of the trust in which one or more persons resident in Canada have a beneficial interest is
A specified year of a qualifying taxpayer is the person's taxation year, calendar year or fiscal year. Generally, if the qualifying taxpayer is a taxpayer for purposes of the ITA or is a partnership described in subparagraph 249(1)(b)(ii) of the ITA, the specified year is the taxation year. If the qualifying taxpayer is a registrant but is not included in the preceding sentence (e.g., the qualifying taxpayer is not a taxpayer for purposes of the ITA), its specified year is the fiscal year. In any other case, it is the calendar year of the person.
A qualifying establishment under section 217 means a permanent establishment as defined in subsection 123(1) or as defined in subsection 132.1(2).
A permanent establishment of a person under subsection 123(1) generally includes
A permanent establishment of a person under subsection 132.1(2) generally includes a permanent establishment under Part IV Taxable Income Earned in a Province by a Corporation or Part XXVI Income Earned in a Province by an Individual of the Income Tax Regulations.
The reference to being resident in Canada in the definition of "qualifying taxpayer" does not include a non‑resident with a permanent establishment under subsection 123(1) in Canada where that person is deemed under subsection 132(2) to be resident in Canada with respect to activities of the person carried on through the establishment. For example, a foreign corporation with a branch that is a permanent establishment under subsection 123(1) located in Canada is not a resident of Canada but is considered a non‑resident with a permanent establishment in Canada.
Similarly, a non‑resident does not include a resident with a permanent establishment under subsection 123(1) in a country other than Canada where that person is deemed under subsection 132(3) to be a non‑resident in respect of activities of the person carried on through that establishment. For example, a corporation resident in Canada with a branch that is a permanent establishment under subsection 123(1) located in another country is not considered to be a non‑resident.
As a result of the meaning of qualifying taxpayer, all FIs resident in Canada are qualifying taxpayers even if the resident FIs do not have any presence outside Canada (for example, they are qualifying taxpayers regardless of whether they have any branches or offices located outside Canada). All non‑resident FIs that operate in Canada through a branch or office that is a qualifying establishment are qualifying taxpayers, and under certain circumstances non‑resident FIs that do not have a branch or office in Canada are also qualifying taxpayers because of the definition of qualifying establishment. Finally, an FI that carries on, engages in or conducts an activity in Canada where a majority of the persons having beneficial ownership of the FI's property in Canada are resident in Canada, and an FI that is prescribed are qualifying taxpayers as well.
A non‑resident insurance corporation does not have an office in Canada, but is licensed to do business in a Canadian province. The insurance corporation is a qualifying taxpayer because it is a non‑resident FI that has a permanent establishment under paragraph 400(2)(c) of the Income Tax Regulations, and therefore is a non‑resident FI with a qualifying establishment in Canada.
Canada Bank is a bank resident in Canada. Canada Bank is a qualifying taxpayer because it is an FI under subsection 149(1) and is resident in Canada.
Mr. J's principal business is acting as an insurance broker in Canada and he is resident in Canada. Mr. J is a qualifying taxpayer because he is an FI under subsection 149(1) and is resident in Canada.
US Bank is resident in the United States and has a branch in Canada. The branch in Canada is a permanent establishment under subsection 123(1). US Bank is a qualifying taxpayer because it is a non‑resident FI with a permanent establishment and therefore a qualifying establishment in Canada.
A non‑resident mutual fund trust has a non‑resident trustee. The majority of the persons having beneficial ownership of the property of the trust are resident in Canada. The non‑resident trust is carrying on activities in Canada, but does not have a permanent establishment in Canada (as defined in subsections 123(1) or 132.1(2)). The non‑resident trust is a qualifying taxpayer because the non‑resident trust is a FI carrying on activities in Canada and the majority of the trust beneficiaries are resident in Canada.
Partnership B's principal business is the lending of money and it is resident in Canada. Partnership B is a qualifying taxpayer because it is an FI under subsection 149(1) and is resident in Canada.
Where an election under section 217.2 is not in effect, paragraph 218.01(b) requires a qualifying taxpayer to pay the GST on the total of all amounts each of which is an amount of qualifying consideration for the specified year that is greater than zero.
In addition, paragraph 218.1(1.2)(b) requires every qualifying taxpayer that is resident in a participating province to pay for each specified year and for each particular participating province the provincial part of the HST. The provincial part of the HST is determined by a formula that in general terms is the qualifying consideration multiplied by the extent (expressed as a percentage) to which the expense that corresponds to the qualifying consideration was used in carrying on an activity of the qualifying taxpayer in the particular province. However, for a specified year that ends before July 1, 2010, tax is determined based on the extent of activity in each participating province in which the qualifying taxpayer is resident at any time in the specified year.
Subsection 218.1(1.3) provides the rules for determining whether a qualifying taxpayer is resident in a province for purposes of self‑assessing under subsection 218.1(1.2). Despite section 132.1 (which generally contains rules for determining when a person is resident in a province for GST/HST purposes), pursuant to subsection 218.1(1.3) a qualifying taxpayer is deemed to be resident in a province at any time if, at that time,
Certain FIs (e.g., certain investment plans) should refer to the Proposed Amendments to the GST/HST Legislation and Part 3 New Harmonized Value‑Added System Regulations No. 2 of the proposed Draft Regulations Amending Various GST/HST Regulations released January 28, 2011 to determine if they are required to self‑assess the provincial part of the HST under subsection 218.1(1.2).
According to the Proposed Amendments to the GST/HST Legislation issued January 28, 2011, it is proposed that subsection 218.1(1.2) be amended to add prescribed percentages for the internal charges, external charges and qualifying consideration of certain FIs attributable to a particular participating province. Reference should also be made to Part 3 New Harmonized Value-added Tax System Regulations No.2 of the proposed Draft Regulations Amending Various GST/HST Regulations also issued January 28, 2011.
Specific to the provinces of Ontario and British Columbia, for a specified year that starts before July 1, 2010, and ends on or after that day, the qualifying taxpayer self‑assesses the provincial part of the HST by also using a formula that adjusts the tax payable under subsection 218.1(1.2) by a percentage based on the number of days of the specified year that are after June 2010 relative to the number of days in the specified year.
Selected listed financial institutions (SLFIs) that fall within section 225.2 are generally not required to self‑assess the provincial part of the HST imposed under subsection 218.1(1.2). These FIs continue to use the special attribution rules under section 225.2 to make adjustments in determining their liability for the provincial part of the HST in respect of the tax self‑assessed. However, one of the exceptions would be an amount of tax that is prescribed for purposes of paragraph (a) of the description of F in subsection 225.2(2) (see Part 1 Selected Listed Financial Institution Attribution Method (GST/HST) Regulations of the proposed Draft Regulations Amending Various GST/HST Regulations). With respect to determining the GST or the federal part of the HST, certain SLFIs should also refer to the rules and proposed draft rules for such FIs.
Qualifying consideration is defined in section 217 and is in respect of an outlay made, or expense incurred, outside Canada. It is determined by the following formula:
A - B
where
In determining an amount of qualifying consideration for a specified year of a qualifying taxpayer, Part A of the formula A - B is generally described as the amount representing the whole or part of an outlay made, or expense incurred, outside Canada that meets the following two criteria:
The first criterion is that the outlay or expense, which is described in subsection 217.1(2), is allowed as a deduction, an allowance or an allocation for a reserve under the ITA in computing the qualifying taxpayer's income for the specified year, or would be so allowed if
As a result, this criterion in Part A of the formula applies regardless of whether the taxpayer is required to pay any income tax or is even subject to any provision related to the computation of income under the ITA.
The second criterion is that the outlay or expense may reasonably be regarded as being applicable to a Canadian activity of the qualifying taxpayer.
The term Canadian activity means an activity of the person carried on, engaged in or conducted in Canada. It would include but is not limited to a business (as defined in subsection 123(1)) carried on. The phrase "carried on, engaged in or conducted in Canada" is intended to give the term "Canadian activity" a broad meaning.
Generally, the effect of Part A of the formula is that any expense or outlay made outside Canada that would be allowed as a deduction under the ITA, and is reasonably regarded as being applicable to a Canadian activity of the qualifying taxpayer, is included and forms the base for qualifying consideration. It should be noted that an amount that falls within the meaning of Part A of the formula must be included in Part A even though the amount may also be a permitted deduction or other amount that is also included in Part B of the formula and thus subtracted from Part A.
As indicated above, the term "qualifying consideration" is in respect of an outlay made, or an expense incurred, outside Canada.
Subsection 217.1(2) indicates that, for the purposes of Division IV, an outlay made, or expense incurred outside Canada includes any amount representing any of the following:
A non‑resident FI has its head office outside Canada and a branch in Canada. Certain head office expenses (e.g., software consulting services) incurred outside Canada are outlays made or expenses incurred outside Canada under subsection 217.1(2) and are with respect to the non‑resident FI's Canadian activity. The expenses are deductible under the ITA. Therefore the amount is included in Part A of qualifying consideration.
A resident FI has some of its employees perform part of their duties in respect of the FI's Canadian activities at a permanent establishment of the FI outside Canada. Since the employees' duties were performed in part outside Canada at a permanent establishment, the qualifying compensation paid to the employees is an outlay made or expense incurred outside Canada under subsection 217.1(2). The amount paid is deductible under the ITA in calculating the FI's income tax. Therefore, the amount is included in Part A of qualifying consideration.
Data processing services were performed outside Canada by a foreign parent corporation for the benefit of a qualifying taxpayer resident in Canada in the qualifying taxpayer's Canadian activities. The expense incurred in respect of these services is an outlay made or expense incurred outside Canada under subsection 217.1(2). The expense is allowed as a deduction under the ITA. Therefore, the amount of the expense is included in Part A of qualifying consideration.
In addition, pursuant to paragraph 217.1(2)(b), any adjustment, in accordance with the transfer pricing rules under the ITA , to increase the expense incurred in respect of those services is also an outlay made or expense incurred outside Canada. Any adjustment that is deducted under the ITA and is with respect to the qualifying taxpayer's Canadian activities is also included in Part A of qualifying consideration.
A non‑resident qualifying taxpayer with a head office outside Canada and a branch in Canada purchases a computer outside Canada to be used in its Canadian activity. The amount is an outlay made or expense incurred outside Canada under subsection 217.1(2). Any amount in respect of capital cost allowance that is permitted as a deduction for purposes of the ITA and that is with respect to a Canadian activity is included in Part A of qualifying consideration.
Part B of the formula A - B is the total of all amounts each of which has been included in Part A of the formula, and is an amount that is a "permitted deduction", or is a specific deduction with respect to derivatives. Only the part of the outlay or expense that is included in Part A that is equal to the amount of the permitted deduction or is in respect of the derivative may be deducted under Part B.
While Part A of the formula forms the base for self‑assessing, Part B reduces in whole or in part the amount included in Part A, thereby reducing the amount upon which GST/HST is assessed or calculated.
The term permitted deduction is defined under section 217. An amount is a permitted deduction if the amount is included in the following list of (a) to (m):
In addition to a permitted deduction under paragraph (a) of Part B, Part B also permits a deduction for certain amounts in respect of derivatives under paragraph (b). Specifically, an amount included in Part A is a cost to a qualifying establishment of the qualifying taxpayer in a country other than Canada, or a profit redistribution from a permanent establishment of the qualifying taxpayer in Canada to one of its permanent establishments in a country other than Canada. The amount must be solely attributable to the issuance, renewal, variance or transfer of ownership by the qualifying taxpayer of a financial instrument that is a derivative. Further, all or substantially all of the amount must be an error or profit margin, or employee compensation or benefits, that is reasonably attributable to the issuance, renewal, variance or transfer of ownership; or be the estimate of the default risk premium directly associated with the derivative. For example, if 10% or more of the cost was attributable to other administrative costs being allocated, this requirement is not met and a deduction under Part B may not be made.
An amount meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of Part B of qualifying consideration may be included in Part B, provided the amount has already been included in Part A.
Where an election under subsection 217.2(1) is in effect, paragraph 218.01(a) requires the qualifying taxpayer to pay GST on the total of all amounts each of which is an internal charge and each of which is an external charge, for a specified year that is greater than zero rather than paying GST on each amount that is qualifying consideration.
In addition to the tax imposed under paragraph 218.01(a), paragraph 218.1(1.2)(a) requires every qualifying taxpayer that is resident in a participating province to pay for each specified year and for each particular participating province the provincial part of the HST. The provincial part of the HST is determined by a formula that in general terms is the total of the internal and external charges multiplied by the extent (expressed as a percentage) to which the expense that corresponds to the total of the internal and external charges was used in carrying on an activity of the qualifying taxpayer in the particular province. For specified years ending before July 1, 2010, tax is determined for each participating province in which the taxpayer is resident at any time in the specified year.
Subsection 218.1(1.3) provides the rules for determining whether a qualifying taxpayer is resident in a province for purposes of self‑assessing under subsection 218.1(1.2). Despite section 132.1 (which generally contains rules for determining when a person is resident in a province for GST/HST purposes), pursuant to subsection 218.1(1.3), a qualifying taxpayer is deemed to be resident in a province at any time if, at that time,
Certain FIs (e.g., certain investment plans) should refer to the Proposed Amendments to the GST/HST Legislation and Part 3 New Harmonized Value‑Added System Regulations No. 2 of the proposed Draft Regulations Amending Various GST/HST Regulations released January 28, 2011 to determine if they are required to self‑assess the provincial part of the HST under subsection 218.1(1.2).
According to the Proposed Amendments to the GST/HST Legislation, it is proposed that subsection 218.1(1.2) be amended to add prescribed percentages for internal charges, external charges and qualifying consideration of certain FIs attributable to a particular participating province. Reference should also be made to Part 3 New Harmonized Value-added Tax System Regulations No.2 of the proposed Draft Regulations Amending Various GST/HST Regulations.
A qualifying taxpayer is required to self‑assess the provincial part of the HST for Ontario and British Columbia for a specified year that begins before July 1, 2010, and ends on or after June 2010, using a formula that adjusts the tax payable under subsection 218.1(1.2) by a percentage based on the number of days in the specified year after June 2010 relative to the number of days in the specified year.
As with self‑assessing qualifying consideration, SLFIs that fall within section 225.2 are generally not required to self‑assess the provincial part of the HST imposed under subsection 218.1(1.2). These FIs continue to use the special attribution rules under section 225.2 to make adjustments in determining their liability for the provincial part of the HST in respect of the tax self‑assessed. However, one of the exceptions would be an amount of tax that is prescribed for purposes of paragraph (a) of the description of F in subsection 225.2(2) (see the proposed Draft Regulations Amending Various GST/HST Regulations (Part 1) Selected Listed Financial Institution Attribution Method (GST/HST) Regulations). With respect to determining the GST or the federal part of the HST, certain selected listed FIs should also refer to the rules and proposed draft rules for such FIs.
The internal charge addresses allocations between Canadian and foreign qualifying establishments (e.g. branches) of the Canadian entity whereas the external charge addresses amounts between entities.
Only a qualifying taxpayer that is a resident in Canada may make an election to determine tax in accordance with paragraph 218.01(a) and where applicable, paragraph 218.1(1.2)(a). For example, a non‑resident qualifying taxpayer with a branch that is a permanent establishment under subsection 123(1) located in Canada is not eligible to make the election and would therefore be required to self‑assess on each amount that is an amount of qualifying consideration for a specified year as discussed above.
As stated above, under a valid election made pursuant to subsection 217.2(1), a qualifying taxpayer is required to self‑assess tax on the total of each amount that is an internal charge and each amount that is an external charge.
The external charge for a specified year of a qualifying taxpayer in respect of an outlay or expense described in any of paragraphs 217.1(2)(a) to (c) means the amount in respect of the outlay or expense determined by the formula
A - B
where
Part A of the formula is generally described as the amount representing the whole or part of an outlay made, or expense incurred, outside Canada that meets the following two criteria:
The first criterion is that the outlay or expense is allowed as a deduction, an allowance or an allocation for a reserve under the ITA in computing the qualifying taxpayer's income for the taxation year, or would be so allowed if
This criterion applies regardless of whether the taxpayer is required to pay any income tax or is even subject to any provision related to the computation of income under the ITA.
The second criterion is that the outlay or expense may reasonably be regarded as being applicable to a Canadian activity of the qualifying taxpayer.
The Canadian activity of a qualifying taxpayer resident in Canada is an activity carried on, engaged in or conducted in Canada.
The determination of Part A of external charge is similar to the determination of Part A of qualifying consideration, but is limited to outlays and expenses described in paragraphs 217.1(2)(a) to (c) as opposed to including all of the paragraphs of subsection 217.1(2) (described under "Qualifying consideration - Outlay made, or expense incurred outside Canada"). Generally, paragraphs 217.1(2)(a) to (c) are in respect of an amount that is an outlay or expense incurred in respect of property transferred and services performed outside Canada, transfer pricing adjustments to such an outlay or expense, and an expenditure or purchase regarding a reportable transaction under section 233.1 of the ITA.
Part B is the total of all amounts, each of which is included in the amount determined under the description in Part A and is a permitted deduction for the specified year or a preceding specified year of the qualifying taxpayer. Therefore, outlays and expenses included in Part A can only be reduced if those amounts fall within the list of permitted deductions. Permitted deduction was discussed under "Qualifying consideration - Permitted deduction".
A qualifying taxpayer resident in Canada has made an election under subsection 217.2(1) to self‑assess on the total of its internal and external charges for a specified year. It acquires research services performed outside Canada, for use in Canada, from one of its subsidiaries outside Canada, and pays GST under section 218 on the imported taxable supply. The expense for the supply of the services was incurred outside Canada and therefore was an outlay made or expense incurred outside Canada under paragraph 217.1(2)(a). The expense is in respect of the qualifying taxpayer's Canadian activities and is also deductible under the ITA. Therefore, the expense is an amount that is included in Part A of external charge.
Since GST was already payable on the supply, the amount of the consideration is a permitted deduction under paragraph (a) of permitted deduction, and the GST payable is a permitted deduction under paragraph (b). As a result the whole of the amount may be included in Part B of external charge. The result is that the amount included in Part A is reduced in whole by the amount included in Part B, and no amount remains as an external charge subject to self‑assessment.
The term "internal charge" is defined under subsection 217.1(4). An internal charge is generally an amount that is treated for income tax purposes both as income in a country other than Canada and as a deduction from income in Canada. An internal charge is not based on an outlay made, or expense incurred outside Canada, in contrast with the external charge. Rather, it is based on an amount in respect of a transaction (a transaction includes an arrangement or event) between a qualifying establishment (e.g. branch) of a qualifying taxpayer resident in Canada and its foreign qualifying establishment located in another country.
An internal charge is an amount that is described in paragraph 217.1(4)(a) and is not excluded under paragraph 217.1(4)(b). An amount is described in paragraph 217.1(4)(a) if it meets either the criteria in subparagraphs 217.1(4)(a)(i) and (ii), or, where subparagraph 217.1(4)(a)(ii) does not apply, the criteria in subparagraphs 217.1(4)(a)(i) and (iii).
Under subsection 217.1(4), for the purposes of Division IV, any part of an amount in respect of a transaction or dealing between a particular qualifying establishment of a qualifying taxpayer in Canada and another qualifying establishment of the qualifying taxpayer in a particular country other than Canada is an internal charge for a specified year of the qualifying taxpayer if
Generally, subparagraphs 217.1(4)(a)(i) and (ii) provide that the amount in respect of the transaction is an amount that would both be included as income or profit of the qualifying establishment (e.g. the foreign branch) under a taxing statute in another country that is a taxing country with which Canada has a tax treaty, and allowed as a deduction (or allowed as an allowance or an allocation for a reserve) in Canada under the ITA. A taxing statute is defined in section 217 to mean a statute of the country, or of a state, province or other political subdivision of the country, that imposes a levy or charge of general application that is an income or profits tax.
If the qualifying taxpayer does not want to use the foreign tax statutes in determining whether the amount is included in determining the foreign qualifying establishment's income or profit under the authority of the taxing country, it may specify in its election that it will make such a determination using the ITA with respect to all its internal charges as if that Act applied to the foreign qualifying establishment.
Where the foreign qualifying establishment does not fall under the tax statutes of a taxing country with which Canada has a tax treaty (i.e. the requirements of subparagraph 217.1(4)(a)(ii) are not met), the amount included in the foreign qualifying establishment's income would generally be determined as if the ITA applied to that establishment (i.e. subparagraph 217.1(4)(a)(iii) would apply).
Generally, for purposes of paragraph 217.1(4)(a) only, subsection 217.1(5) isolates the qualifying establishment in Canada and the qualifying establishment in another country from each other and from the remainder of the qualifying taxpayer (e.g. any other branches). It deems the two particular qualifying establishments each to be separate and distinct enterprises from the qualifying taxpayer, to be engaged in similar activities as the qualifying taxpayer, and to be dealing wholly independently with each other and the remainder of the qualifying taxpayer. Further, any transactions or dealings between the qualifying establishment in Canada and the particular qualifying establishment in another country are deemed to be supplies made on terms as would have been agreed upon between parties dealing at arm's length.
An amount falling within paragraph 217.1(4)(a) described above does not include the part of the amount that is within paragraph 217.1(4)(b). As a result, the amount that is an internal charge does not include:
The internal charge determined under subsection 217.1(4) is added together with the external charge determined under section 217 to form the amount upon which to self-assess tax under the election pursuant to subsection 217.2(1).
A qualifying taxpayer resident in Canada has made an election under subsection 217.2(1) to self‑assess on the total of its internal charges and external charges for a specified year. An amount is allocated by the qualifying taxpayer to its head office located in Canada for research services performed in the U.S. by the U.S. branch for use by the head office in Canada. The amount is deducted by the qualifying taxpayer in computing the income of the head office under the ITA and therefore meets the requirements of subparagraph 217.1(4)(a)(i). The amount is also required by the qualifying taxpayer to be included as income under the taxing statutes of the U.S. in computing the income of the U.S. branch and meets the requirements of subparagraph 217.1(4)(a)(ii).
Since no part of the amount was accounted for under an external charge, no part was a permitted deduction, and the amount was not with respect to derivatives, the exclusions in paragraph 217.1(4)(b) do not apply. As a result, the whole amount allocated to the Canadian head office is an internal charge under paragraph 217.1(4)(a) and is subject to self‑assessment.
The election form for the election under subsection 217.2(1), Form RC4600, Election or Revocation of an Election Under Subsection 217.2(1), must be filed with the Minister on or before the day on or before which the qualifying taxpayer's return under section 219 in respect of tax under section 218.01 or subsection 218.1(1.2) for the first specified year during which the election is in effect is required to be filed.
The election is effective on the first day of the specified year set out in the form, and ceases to have effect the earlier of
However, once an election is made, a qualifying taxpayer may only revoke the election effective on the first day of a specified year after the election has been in effect for at least two years. The qualifying taxpayer who wishes to revoke an election must file Form RC4600 with the Minister not later than the day on which the revocation is to become effective.
Further, if the qualifying taxpayer revokes an election and then subsequently wishes to make another election under subsection 217.2(1), any subsequent election is not a valid election unless the first day of the specified year set out in the subsequent election is at least two years after the day on which the revocation became effective.
Transitional rules exist for a qualifying taxpayer who was required to file a return under section 219 on or before July 12, 2010. The qualifying taxpayer may subsequently make the election in respect of a specified year for which a return has already been filed provided the election is filed with the Minister by the day that is sixty days after July 12, 2010. Further, the qualifying taxpayer may recover the amount by which the total tax previously remitted exceeds the total tax payable as a result of making the election for the specified year provided the qualifying taxpayer requests in writing no later than two years after July 12, 2010 that the Minister make an assessment, reassessment or additional assessment for the excess amount of tax remitted as a result of subsequently making the election under subsection 217.2(1) in respect of the specified year.
If the qualifying taxpayer is engaged in commercial activities and the external charge, internal charge or the qualifying consideration is attributable to those activities, the qualifying taxpayer may be entitled to claim input tax credits (ITCs) in respect of the amount of tax self‑assessed.
Subsection 217.1(6) contains a special rule which generally converts the tax payable or paid without having become payable (i.e. the tax self‑assessed) on an amount that is qualifying consideration or an external charge into tax paid on a supply of a property or qualifying service (i.e. a service or duty) in order that the rules for determining an ITC under section 169 can be applied. Both qualifying consideration and an external charge are based on outlays or expenses made outside Canada as described in subsection 217.1(2), and such outlays are generally in respect of property and qualifying services. The qualifying consideration or external charge in respect of an outlay made, or expense incurred outside Canada that is greater than zero for a specified year of the qualifying taxpayer is referred to as a qualifying expenditure for purposes of the rules in subsection 217.1(6).
Subsection 217.1(6) provides that the following rules apply to a qualifying expenditure:
The effect of the rules is that a qualifying taxpayer is required to analyze the extent to which the qualifying taxpayer acquired an attributable property or attributable service for consumption, use or supply in the course of the qualifying taxpayer's commercial activities. Then, to the extent the requirements in section 169 are met, an ITC may be claimed for the tax self‑assessed on the qualifying consideration or the external charge.
Subsection 217.1(7) contains a special rule which generally converts the tax payable or paid without having become payable (i.e. the tax self‑assessed) on certain amounts that are included as an internal charge into tax paid on a supply of property or qualifying service in order that the rules for determining an ITC under section 169 may be applied.
As noted above under internal charge, an internal charge is based on an amount for a transaction or dealing between permanent establishments of a qualifying taxpayer, and is not based on an outlay made or expense incurred outside Canada. It excludes amounts that are an external charge, and certain other amounts as discussed above. Only where an internal charge is determined based in whole or in part on the inclusion of an outlay made, or an expense incurred outside Canada, will the rules in subsection 217.1(7) apply.
For purposes of subsection 217.1(7), the amount of tax to be self‑assessed on an internal charge is referred to as "internal tax". The following rules apply where there is internal tax in respect of an internal charge determined based in whole or in part on the inclusion of an outlay made, or expense incurred outside Canada:
In general, a qualifying taxpayer would be required to analyze the extent to which it acquired an internal property or internal service for the purpose of making a taxable supply or for consumption or use during that specified year in the course of the qualifying taxpayer's commercial activities. If an amount of internal tax is not attributable to an outlay made, or expense incurred, outside Canada, no ITC is available in respect of that internal tax.
Section 218.3 provides that the tax that the qualifying taxpayer determined under section 218.01 and subsection 218.1(1.2) for a specified year becomes payable by the qualifying taxpayer on
Section 219 provides that a qualifying taxpayer is required to file a return and remit the tax payable that was determined under section 218.01 and subsection 218.1(1.2).
If the qualifying taxpayer is a registrant, the qualifying taxpayer is required to pay the tax and file a prescribed return regarding the tax on or before the day on or before which the registrant's GST/HST return for the GST/HST reporting period in which the tax became payable is required to be filed (section 219). The amount of tax payable would be included on line 405 of Form GST34, Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax (GST/HST) Return for Registrants.
If the qualifying taxpayer is not a registrant, the qualifying taxpayer is required to pay the tax and file a prescribed return regarding that tax on or before the last day of the month following the calendar month in which the tax became payable (section 219). The amount of qualifying consideration for a specified year would be included on line 401 of Form GST59, Return for Imported Taxable Supplies and Qualifying Consideration and the appropriate tax calculated.
If the qualifying taxpayer is a registrant SLFI and an annual filer, the amount of tax payable under section 218.01 would be included on line 405 of Form GST494, Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax Final Return for Selected Listed Financial Institutions. A qualifying taxpayer that is a registrant SLFI and a monthly or quarterly filer would include the amount of tax payable under section 218.01 (included on line 405 of Form GST34) on line 405 of Form GST494.
If the qualifying taxpayer is a non‑registrant SLFI, the total amount of tax payable under section 218.01 included on line 402 of Forms GST59 would be included on line 405 of Form GST494.
Technical enquiries on the GST/HST: 1‑800‑959‑8287
General enquiries on the GST/HST: 1‑800‑959‑5525 (Business Enquiries)
If you are located in Quebec: 1‑800‑567‑4692 (Revenu Québec)
All technical publications related to the GST/HST are available on the CRA Web site at www.cra.gc.ca/gsthsttech.
A financial institution includes:
A person is generally a listed financial institution throughout its particular fiscal year if an any time in the particular year the person is included in any one of the categories in subparagraphs 149(1)(a)(i) through (xi).
Examples of listed financial institutions are:
A person that is a listed financial institution may also be a selected listed financial institution (SLFI) if section 225.2 applies. Pursuant to the proposed changes to the Act and the proposed draft Selected Listed Financial Institutions Attribution Method (GST/HST) Regulations, a financial institution would generally be considered to be an SLFI throughout a reporting period in a fiscal year that ends in a particular tax year of the financial institution if it is a listed financial institution described in any of subparagraphs 149(1)(a)(i) to (x) at any time during the particular tax year, and the financial institution has a permanent establishment in a participating province and a permanent establishment in any other province, at any time during the tax year. It is proposed that the definition of what constitutes a permanent establishment be expanded.
A person who is only a financial institution because the person is deemed to be one when an election under subsection 150(1) is in effect, is not an SLFI.
For additional information on the different types of listed financial institutions, refer to GST/HST Memorandum 17.6, Definition of "Listed Financial Institution".
Under paragraph 149(1)(b) a person is generally a financial institution if the person's "financial revenue" in the immediately preceding fiscal year exceeds 10% of its total revenues (other than from sales of capital property) and exceeds $10 million. "Financial revenue" generally includes interest, dividends or a separate fee or charge for a financial service that is included in computing the person's income for purposes of the Income Tax Act, but excludes the following:
For example, a holding corporation may be considered a financial institution if it earns financial revenues such as dividends from an unrelated corporation for the previous fiscal year to the extent that it meets the thresholds mentioned above.
Under paragraph 149(1)(c), a person is generally a financial institution if the person's income for purposes of the Income Tax Act from interest or separate fees related to credit cards issued by the person, or related to loans, advances or credit granted by the person, exceeded $1 million in its preceding fiscal year. For the purpose of this de minimis test, penalties levied by a vendor for late payment of an account receivable generated in the normal course of the vendor's business would not be considered to be a fee for the provision of credit. In addition, interest from a related corporation is not included in this total.
For example, a department store that issues credit cards to its customers and that receives interest related to those credit cards could be a financial institution if the income it earns from the interest exceeds $1 million in its preceding fiscal year.